One ruling, two interpretations

The government has announced that the emergency arbitrator rejected the new demands of the shareholders of ENA, belonging to the arrested businessman Samvel Karapetyan. But Karapetyan's defense team insists that the Stockholm arbitration has confirmed the binding nature of the decision prohibiting the confiscation of ENA. What did the Stockholm arbitration actually say in the ENA case, and why are the government and Samvel Karapetyan's team presenting diametrically opposed pictures? More in the report.